Category: Bombay High Court

  • Delegated Legislation in Indirect Taxes: Judicial Scrutiny under the Customs Act, 1962 & Indirect Taxes

    Delegated Legislation in Indirect Taxes: Judicial Scrutiny under the Customs Act, 1962 & Indirect Taxes

    Date: 28.08.2025

    ​ ​ ​ ​

    • Article 245–246: Only Parliament/State legislatures can levy taxes; delegation cannot include β€œessential legislative functions.”
    • Article 265: β€œNo tax shall be levied or collected except by authority of law.” Thus, a rule, notification, circular, or regulation cannot create/expand a tax liability without clear legislative sanction.
    • Doctrine of Excessive Delegation: Laid down in In re Delhi Laws Act (1951 SCR 747), later reaffirmed in Avinder Singh v. State of Punjab (1979 1 SCC 137). Parliament may delegate the manner or details of implementation, but not the policy or essential features.
    • Judicial role: Courts test whether delegated instruments remain within the β€œparent Act” or trespass into taxation without statute.

    Handy Download:

  • Bombay High Court Quashes IGST Interest and Penalty

    Bombay High Court Quashes IGST Interest and Penalty

    Date: 11.07.2025

    In a significant ruling, the Hon’ble Bombay High Court in A.R. Sulphonates Pvt. Ltd. v. Union of India & Ors., Writ Petition No. 19366 of 2024, delivered on 9th April 2025, held that interest, penalty, and redemption fine imposed for non-compliance with the β€œpre-import” condition under the Advance Authorization Scheme are without the authority of law. The Court quashed the relevant portion of the Customs adjudication order dated 1st August 2024 and invalidated CBIC Circular No. 16/2023-Customs to the extent it sought to recover interest along with IGST.

    The Petitioner, A.R. Sulphonates Pvt. Ltd., imported Linear Alkyl Benzene (LAB) under eleven Advance Authorization Licenses between 27th October 2017 and 27th March 2018. These imports were made without payment of IGST, relying on Notification No. 18/2015-Cus. as amended by Notification No. 79/2017-Cus., which imposed a β€œpre-import” condition for exemption from IGST.

    Subsequently, DRI initiated investigations alleging violation of the pre-import condition, leading to the issuance of a Show Cause Notice seeking:

    • IGST demand of β‚Ή7.18 crore,
    • Interest under Section 28AA,
    • Penalty under Section 112(a),
    • Redemption fine of β‚Ή2 crore under Section 125, and
    • Enforcement of bonds under Section 143(3).
    • The adjudication order dated 1st August 2024 confirmed these demands.

    Handy Download: