Aadrikaa Legal Services (ALS) – IDT Tax I Arbitration I Litigation
Date: 16.06.2026
Delhi High Court Quashes Customs Circulars on Indonesian Gold Jewellery Imports
This Short Article has been prepared & written by Advocate Ravi Shekhar Jha-Delhi High Court, New Delhi. The views expressed are based on his interpretation of the law. He can be reached at his email id intelconsul@gmail.com .
The Delhi High Court delivered a landmark judgment in the case involving the Bullion and Jewellers Association (Regd.) and J B Overseas versus the Union of India and others, addressing the legality of customs circulars that denied preferential duty benefits to gold jewellery imported from Indonesia under the ASEAN-India Free Trade Agreement (AIFTA).
Background
Members of the Bullion and Jewellers Association and J B Overseas regularly imported gold jewellery from Indonesia, relying on the preferential customs duty rates provided under the AIFTA. These imports were supported by Certificates of Origin (COOs) issued by Indonesian authorities, confirming the goods’ Indonesian origin. However, the Central Board of Excise and Customs (CBEC) issued two circulars:
- Circular dated 6th October 2015: Directed customs authorities to disregard Indonesian COOs and deny preferential duty benefits, citing doubts about the origin of the gold used in the jewellery.
- Circular dated 20th January 2016: Required importers to provide a 100% bank guarantee of the duty differential for provisional assessment of such imports.
These circulars were challenged by the petitioners, who argued that they were ultra vires (beyond the powers) of the Customs Act and violated the procedures established under the AIFTA and Indian law.
Key Issues and Arguments
- Petitioners’ Stand:
- The circulars overstepped the CBEC’s authority under Section 151A of the Customs Act, which prohibits instructions that dictate the outcome of individual assessments.
- The COOs were genuine, verified by Indonesian authorities, and the gold used was of Indonesian origin.
- The circulars imposed unreasonable and onerous conditions not contemplated by the law or the trade agreement.
- The demand for a 100% bank guarantee contradicted the Customs (Provisional Duty Assessment) Regulations, which cap such guarantees at 20%.
- Respondents’ Stand:
- The CBEC argued that the circulars were necessary to ensure uniformity and protect revenue, given doubts about the origin of the gold.
- They claimed the circulars only provided procedural guidance and did not dictate specific outcomes.
Court’s Analysis
The Court conducted a detailed examination of the AIFTA, the Customs Tariff Origin Rules, and the operational procedures for verifying the origin of goods. It found:
- Verification Procedures Ignored: The customs authorities failed to follow the detailed verification and dispute resolution procedures outlined in the AIFTA and Indian rules. Indonesian authorities had confirmed the origin of the gold, and no evidence of fraud or misrepresentation was presented.
- Ultra Vires Circulars: The circulars effectively dictated the outcome of customs assessments, violating Section 151A of the Customs Act. They imposed additional requirements not found in the law or the trade agreement, and the 100% bank guarantee demand was contrary to the regulations.
- Invalid Show Cause Notices: Show cause notices issued to importers were mere reproductions of the circulars, lacking independent application of mind by customs officers.
Judgment and Impact
The Delhi High Court:
- Quashed the CBEC Circulars dated 6th October 2015 and 20th January 2016 as ultra vires and unsustainable in law.
- Set aside all proceedings and communications based on these circulars, including the demand for a 100% bank guarantee.
- Directed customs officers to decide any show cause notices or applications for provisional release of goods independently, without being influenced by the quashed circulars.
This judgment reinforces the importance of following due process and respecting the autonomy of quasi-judicial authorities in customs matters. It also upholds the integrity of international trade agreements and provides relief to importers relying on preferential trade benefits.
Connected Matter
Source: Delhi High Court
Handy Download:
Write to us at office@aadrikaalaw.com
Tel: +91-11-4999 2707 I +91-9999005379