Aadrikaa Legal Services (ALS) – IDT Tax I Arbitration I Litigation
Date: 22.06.2026
Delhi HC Sets Aside PRC Orders Against O.C. Sweaters LLP: Emphasizing Natural Justice and Right to Personal Hearing in Advance Authorization Disputes
This Short Article has been prepared & written by Advocate Ravi Shekhar Jha-Delhi High Court, New Delhi. The views expressed are based on his interpretation of the law. He can be reached at his email id intelconsul@gmail.com .
O.C. Sweaters LLP, a garment manufacturer and exporter based in Gurugram, Haryana, faced a legal challenge after its export shipments were not recognized under the Advance Authorization Scheme due to technical glitches in data transmission between the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) and Customs authorities.
The company had obtained an Advance Authorization to fulfill an urgent export order from EMJ Apparel Group LLC, USA, but opted to procure raw materials domestically to save time. Despite following due procedures and repeatedly informing authorities about the technical issues, two key export shipments were processed under a zero-rated scheme instead of the intended Advance Authorization Scheme.
Legal Proceedings and Petitionerβs Arguments
O.C. Sweaters LLP approached the Policy Relaxation Committee (PRC) multiple times, seeking relaxation and recognition of its shipments under the Advance Authorization Scheme. The PRC rejected the requests, citing lack of justification for genuine hardship and did not grant a personal hearing, despite repeated requests from the petitioner. The company argued that:
- The technical glitch was beyond its control and caused by the authorities.
- All procedural requirements were met, and subsequent shipments were processed correctly under the scheme.
- The denial of a personal hearing violated principles of natural justice as outlined in the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP).
- The impugned orders were mechanical and lacked proper reasoning.
Courtβs Analysis
Justice Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav of the Delhi High Court examined the case in light of the relevant provisions of the FTP, particularly Paras 2.59 and 2.60, which empower the DGFT to grant exemptions and mandate personal hearings in cases of genuine hardship. The Court noted:
- The PRC failed to consider whether the petitioner was prevented from availing the scheme due to circumstances beyond its control.
- The authorities did not provide cogent reasons for their decisions, amounting to a “rubber-stamp” approach.
- The denial of a personal hearing was a violation of natural justice, as emphasized by Supreme Court precedents.
- The respondents did not file any reply, leaving the petitionerβs assertions unchallenged.
Judgment and Implications
The Delhi High Court set aside the impugned orders dated 03.01.2023, 20.10.2023, and 22.03.2024, and remanded the matter to the competent authority for fresh consideration. The Court directed that:
- O.C. Sweaters LLP must be given an effective opportunity of personal hearing.
- A new, reasoned order must be passed in accordance with law and the FTP.
- No final opinion was expressed on the merits, and all rights and contentions remain open.
Key Takeaways for Exporters
- Procedural Fairness: Authorities must provide clear, reasoned decisions and adhere to principles of natural justice, including the right to a personal hearing.
- Technical Glitches: Exporters facing technical issues beyond their control should document all communications and efforts to resolve the matter.
- Remedies: The FTP provides avenues for relaxation and exemption in cases of genuine hardship, and courts can intervene if authorities fail to apply these provisions fairly.
This judgment reinforces the importance of transparency, accountability, and procedural fairness in administrative decision-making affecting exporters under the Advance Authorization Scheme.
Listen to this on our #YouTube Channel
Source: Delhi High Court
Handy Download:
Write to us at office@aadrikaalaw.com
Tel: +91-11-4999 2707 I +91-9999005379