Aadrikaa Legal Services (ALS)- Law I Litigation I Arbitration
Date: 07.08.2026
CESTAT Kolkata on SHIS License Utilization and Capital Goods Definition in Customs Dispute
This Short Article has been prepared & written by Advocate Ravi Shekhar Jha-Delhi High Court, New Delhi. The views expressed are based on his interpretation of the law. He can be reached at his email id intelconsul@gmail.com .
The Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Kolkata recently delivered a significant judgment in the case of Usha Martin Limited, addressing the complex issue of utilizing Status Holder Incentive Scrips (SHIS) for importing capital goods under Indian customs regulations. This article provides a detailed analysis of the case, the legal arguments, and the implications for Indian exporters and manufacturers.
Background of the Case
Usha Martin Limited, a prominent manufacturer of iron and steel products, exported goods worth over Rs. 1,315 crore between 2010-11 and 2012-13. As a recognized Trading House, the company was granted SHIS scrips amounting to 1% of its export value, in accordance with the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009-14. These scrips allowed the company to import capital goods at concessional customs duty rates under Notification No. 104/2009-Cus.
The dispute arose when customs authorities alleged that Usha Martin had wrongly availed the SHIS benefit for certain importsβspecifically, items like “Whims Bottom Parts,” “Driving Wheels,” “Gaskets,” and “Spare Parts for Coke Oven Plant”βwhich were classified as parts/spares/components of capital goods. The authorities claimed that the company exceeded the permissible 10% duty debit limit for such items, violating the conditions of the notification and the FTP.
Key Legal Issues
- Definition of Capital Goods: The central question was whether the imported items qualified as “capital goods” under Notification No. 104/2009-Cus. and the FTP 2009-14. The notification defines capital goods broadly, including plant, machinery, equipment, or accessories required for manufacturing, modernization, or expansion.
- 10% Restriction: The customs department argued that imports of parts/spares/components of capital goods imported earlier are subject to a 10% value restriction. Usha Martin contended that their imports were for new capital goods and modernization projects, not for previously imported machinery, and thus not subject to this cap.
- Limitation and Penalty: The department invoked the extended limitation period and imposed penalties, alleging suppression of facts by Usha Martin. The company argued that all imports were transparently declared and that the extended period and penalties were unjustified.
Arguments Presented
Usha Martin Limited
- Legitimate Use of SHIS: The company maintained that all imports were for capital goods or accessories used in modernization and expansion, supported by technical documents and Chartered Engineer’s Certificates.
- Broad Definition: Cited multiple tribunal and Supreme Court judgments affirming the wide scope of “capital goods,” including parts and accessories.
- No Suppression: Asserted that all details were disclosed to customs, and there was no intent to evade duty.
- Procedural Lapses: Highlighted that the show cause notice was adjudicated beyond the statutory time limit, rendering the order invalid.
Customs Department
- Excess Duty Debit: Alleged that Usha Martin exceeded the 10% limit for parts/spares/components.
- Misclassification: Claimed that the imported items were not capital goods but merely parts, thus not eligible for full SHIS benefit.
- Suppression of Facts: Accused the company of misrepresenting the nature of imports.
Tribunal’s Findings and Decision
- Wide Definition Upheld: The tribunal reaffirmed that the definition of capital goods under the notification and FTP is broad, covering not just machinery but also accessories and parts required for modernization and expansion.
- No Violation of 10% Rule: It was held that the 10% restriction applies only to parts/spares/components of capital goods imported earlier, not to new capital goods or their accessories. Usha Martin’s imports were for new projects and modernization, thus not subject to the cap.
- No Suppression or Misdeclaration: The tribunal found no evidence of deliberate suppression or misrepresentation by Usha Martin. All imports were properly declared, and the SHIS scrips were presented to customs at the time of import.
- Procedural Compliance: The tribunal noted procedural lapses by the department, including delayed adjudication of the show cause notice.
- Order Set Aside: The demand for Rs. 1.3 crore in customs duty, interest, and penalty was quashed, and the appeal was allowed in favor of Usha Martin.
Implications for Exporters and Importers
- Clarity on Capital Goods Definition: The judgment reinforces the inclusive definition of capital goods, benefiting manufacturers investing in modernization and expansion.
- SHIS Utilization: Companies can confidently use SHIS scrips for importing a wide range of capital goods and accessories, provided they are for new projects and not for previously imported machinery.
- Procedural Safeguards: The case highlights the importance of timely adjudication and transparent documentation in customs proceedings.
Conclusion
The CESTAT Kolkata’s decision in favor of Usha Martin Limited sets a significant precedent for the interpretation of SHIS license utilization and the definition of capital goods under Indian customs law. It provides much-needed clarity and relief to exporters and manufacturers seeking to upgrade their facilities, ensuring that the objectives of the Foreign Trade Policy are upheld.
Aadrikaa Legal Services is a trusted legal and regulatory support partner providing end-to-end legal solutions to law firms, corporate organizations, and businesses across India. We specialize in paralegal services, litigation support, tax and regulatory matters, delivering reliable, efficient, and result-oriented legal assistance.
Our services include comprehensive paralegal support, drafting and documentation, legal research, case management, litigation handling, and representation support across various judicial and quasi-judicial forums. We also assist in direct and indirect tax matters, customs, GST, corporate regulatory compliance, and legal advisory.
Source: CESTAT Kolkata
Handy Download:
Write to us at office@aadrikaalaw.com
Tel: +91-11-4999 2707