Category: ACTS

  • CESTAT Chennai Favors Importer in PVC Resin Classification Dispute

    CESTAT Chennai Favors Importer in PVC Resin Classification Dispute

    Date: 22.07.2025

    The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chennai Bench, set aside the order of the Commissioner (Appeals) and allowed the appeal filed by Ram Nath Co. Pvt. Ltd. The case centered on the correct classification of PVC Resin SP 660 Suspension Grade and the eligibility of the importer to claim the benefit under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus dated 01.06.2011.

    The Tribunal reiterated the legal principle that a specific tariff entry must be preferred over a general or residual one, upholding the classification under CTH 39042110 and rejecting the Department’s reclassification under CTH 39041090.

    • The appellant imported PVC Resin SP 660 (Suspension Grade) and classified it under CTH 39042110 (Polyvinyl Chloride resins, non-plasticised) while claiming exemption under Notification No. 46/2011-Cus.
    • The Department, based on a test report from CIPET, reclassified the product under CTH 39041090 (Polyvinyl Chloride not mixed with other substances – Other) and denied the exemption.
    • The Commissioner (Appeals) upheld the reclassification, prompting the importer to file an appeal before CESTAT.

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Mumbai Allows Conversion of 1767 Shipping Bills Beyond 3-Year Limit

    CESTAT Mumbai Allows Conversion of 1767 Shipping Bills Beyond 3-Year Limit

    Date: 21.07.2025

    ADF Foods Ltd., a leading exporter of pickles, namkeens, and chutneys, approached the Commissioner of Customs (NS-II), Nhava Sheva seeking conversion of 2463 shipping bills from the Drawback Scheme to the Duty-Free Import Authorization (DFIA) Scheme under Section 149 of the Customs Act, 1962.

    While the Commissioner allowed conversion for 696 shipping bills, conversion for the remaining 1767 shipping bills was rejected on the ground of being beyond 3 years from the date of exportβ€”by invoking Article 137 of the Limitation Act.

    1. Whether a time limit of 3 years can be imposed on conversion under Section 149 of the Customs Act?
    2. Whether conversion is impermissible if benefit of the original export scheme (Drawback) has already been availed?
    3. Whether procedural barriers in circulars can override statutory provisions?

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside Drawback Recovery and Penalty

    CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside Drawback Recovery and Penalty

    Date: 21.07.2025

    The case revolves around allegations of fraudulent claim of duty drawback and DEPB credits by three exporters who allegedly mis-declared goods as high-value items like gear cutting tools of cobalt-bearing high-speed steel and heat-resistant rubber tension tapes through the Ludhiana port.

    The Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), Amritsar, initiated investigations linking the appellants to a broader fraud syndicate allegedly operated shell firms like Jyoti Steel and Krishna Hardware. The appellants were accused of receiving fictitious invoices from these shell companies to claim inflated export benefits.

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Bangalore Clarifies Travertine Classification and Upholds Exemption for Marble Slabs

    CESTAT Bangalore Clarifies Travertine Classification and Upholds Exemption for Marble Slabs

    Date: 19.07.2025

    The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Bangalore, in Final Order Nos. 21002-21004/2025 dated 15.07.2025, held that Travertineβ€”a calcareous stoneβ€”is a variety of Marble, and therefore eligible for the concessional Central Excise duty (CVD) benefit under Sl. No. 54 of Notification No. 12/2012-CE dated 17.03.2012. This decision sets aside duty demands and penalties imposed on M/s Marble Centre International Pvt. Ltd. and its Executive Director.

    • The appellant imported Honed/Semi-Polished Marble Slabs including Travertino Titanium, Travertine Extence, Silver Beige, etc., and classified them under CTH 68022190.
    • The customs authority denied them the benefit of reduced CVD @ Rs. 60 per sq. metre under Notification No. 12/2012-CE, arguing that Travertine is not marble.
    • Demand notices for differential duty amounting to over β‚Ή1.24 crore, along with interest and personal penalties, were issued.

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Kolkata Orders 12% Interest on β‚Ή50 Lakh Refund to Exporter

    CESTAT Kolkata Orders 12% Interest on β‚Ή50 Lakh Refund to Exporter

    Date: 18.07.2025

    In a significant pro-importer decision, the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Kolkata, in the case of M/s Alliance International v. Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata [Final Order No. 76921/2025 dated 15.07.2025], has upheld the right of the appellant to receive interest at 12% per annum on a pre-deposit of β‚Ή50 lakh made during the investigation stage. This ruling reinforces the jurisprudence that interest must be paid on pre-deposits when the same are refunded post-adjudication.

    • Appellant: M/s Alliance International, Chandigarh
    • Respondent: Commissioner of Customs (Port), Kolkata
    • Issue: Denial of interest on β‚Ή50 lakh refunded post-investigation
    • Relevant Period: Exports made between July 2016 – August 2020
    • Controversy: Alleged misdeclaration of exported goods as refractory mortar instead of chrome ore concentrateβ€”a restricted item liable to 30% export duty

    During the course of the investigation initiated by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI), the appellant was compelled to deposit β‚Ή50,00,000 on 16.10.2020. Eventually, the adjudicating authority, vide order dated 31.01.2023, ruled in favour of the appellant and directed refund of the deposit.

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Bangalore Allows Conversion of Free Shipping Bills to Drawback Bills

    CESTAT Bangalore Allows Conversion of Free Shipping Bills to Drawback Bills

    Date: 17.07.2025

    In a major relief to exporters affected by the early days of the GST transition, the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT) Bangalore has allowed conversion of free shipping bills into drawback shipping bills filed by M/s Nitta Gelatin India Ltd., setting aside the rejection order passed by the Commissioner of Customs, Cochin.

    • Exports Made: Between 25.07.2017 and 04.08.2017
    • Products: Gelatin, Chitosan, and Ossein
    • Issue: The exporter filed free shipping bills without claiming duty drawback, but later requested conversion to All Industry Rate (AIR) drawback shipping bills.
    • Request Date: 23.08.2017 β€” within a month from export
    • Grounds: Circular No. 22/2017-Cus. dated 30.06.2017 allowed exporters to claim drawback during GST transition period (01.07.2017 – 30.09.2017)

    However, the Commissioner rejected the request, citing non-compliance with Rule 12(1)(a) of the Drawback Rules, 1995, and held that the reasons were not “beyond the control” of the exporter.

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside Warehouse License Cancellation

    CESTAT Chandigarh Sets Aside Warehouse License Cancellation

    Date: 16.07.2025

    In a significant ruling favoring the rights of bonded warehouse license holders, the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Chandigarh Bench, has set aside the cancellation of the Public Bonded Warehouse License of M/s Ajay Wines & Spirits, while upholding a monetary penalty of β‚Ή4 lakhs under Section 117 of the Customs Act, 1962.

    • M/s Ajay Wines & Spirits was operating under a Public Bonded Warehouse License No. 08/2023, granted under Section 57 of the Customs Act.
    • Two separate stock verifications conducted in April 2024 revealed shortages of imported liquor cases:
      • 04.04.2024: 339 cases found short; duty of β‚Ή17.14 lakhs was deposited.
      • 23.04.2024: Additional shortages observed related to stock of M/s Castle Spirits Pvt. Ltd.
    • A Show Cause Notice was issued proposing:
      • Cancellation of the warehouse license under Section 58B
      • Penalty under Section 117 for contravention of warehouse regulations

    The Principal Commissioner of Customs, Ludhiana, vide Order-in-Original dated 21.05.2025, imposed the maximum penalty and cancelled the warehouse license of the appellant.

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarders

    CESTAT Chennai Sets Aside Penalty on Freight Forwarders

    Date: 15.07.2025

    The appeals arose from a penalty order passed by the Commissioner of Customs (Seaport – Export), Chennai, against two Custom House Agents (CHAs):

    • M/s. Meticulous Forwarders
    • M/s. Masterstroke Freight Forwarders Pvt. Ltd.

    They were penalized β‚Ή7,00,000 each under Section 112(a) of the Customs Act, 1962, for allegedly aiding the diversion of duty-free imported raw silk yarn by M/s. Kalp Impex under the Advance Authorisation Scheme, which was reportedly sold locally without fulfilling export obligations.

    Handy Download:

  • CESTAT Delhi Allows Duty Exemption on Lithium-Ion Battery Components

    CESTAT Delhi Allows Duty Exemption on Lithium-Ion Battery Components

    Date: 14.07.2025

    The Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT), Delhi has allowed M/s XOR Technologies LLP to avail duty exemption under Entry 512 of Notification No. 50/2017-Cus, holding that the manufacture of lithium-ion batteriesβ€”even when used in power banksβ€”satisfies the conditions of the notification. The Tribunal quashed the demand of β‚Ή8.13 crores raised by the Customs Department and dismissed the penalty under Section 114A of the Customs Act, 1962.

    • Appellant: M/s XOR Technologies LLP, Delhi
    • Products Involved: Lithium-ion cells, USB cables, nickel strips, plastic housing, etc.
    • Period: FY 2017 to 2019
    • Notification Involved: No. 50/2017-Cus, Entry 512
    • Allegation: Components were used in power banks, not in lithium-ion batteries, violating the terms of the exemption.
    • Duty Demand: β‚Ή8,12,95,799 with interest and equal penalty under Section 114A

    Handy Download:

  • Kerala High Court Upholds DGFT’s Supremacy in Advance Authorization Dispute

    Kerala High Court Upholds DGFT’s Supremacy in Advance Authorization Dispute

    Date: 12.07.2025

    Nitta Gelatin India Ltd., a Cochin-based manufacturer of collagen peptides, was importing decalcified fish scales under the Advance Authorization Scheme (AAS) issued by the DGFT. While earlier imports (2012–2016) were described as β€œfish protein”, a customs inspection in April 2016 led to the goods being classified by Revenue as β€œdecalcified fish scale” under CTH 0511 9190, instead of the claimed β€œfish protein” under CTH 3504 0099.

    Customs alleged misdeclaration and issued a Show Cause Notice in respect of 51 consignments. The Commissioner of Customs demanded differential duty, imposed redemption fine, and levied penalties under Sections 112(a), 114A, and 114AA of the Customs Act, 1962.

    Handy Download: