Aadrikaa Legal Services (ALS) – IDT Tax I Arbitration I Litigation
Date: 04.07.2026
Delhi High Court Strikes Down Retrospective Withdrawal of Export Incentives
This Short Article has been prepared & written by Advocate Ravi Shekhar Jha-Delhi High Court, New Delhi. The views expressed are based on his interpretation of the law. He can be reached at his email idΒ intelconsul@gmail.com . Β
A recent judgment by the Delhi High Court has significant implications for exporters and the administration of export incentive schemes in India. The case, involving Malik Tanning Industries and M/s Kavish Impex Pvt. Ltd. versus the Union of India, addressed the legality of a retrospective circular issued by the Directorate General of Foreign Trade (DGFT) that curtailed export incentives under the Focus Product Scheme (FPS).
Background: The Focus Product Scheme and the Dispute
The Focus Product Scheme (FPS), part of the Foreign Trade Policy (FTP) 2009-2014, was designed to incentivize exports of products with high export intensity or employment potential. Exporters of notified products, as listed in Appendix 37D of the Handbook of Procedures, were entitled to Duty Credit Scrips equivalent to 2% of the Free on Board (FOB) value of their exports.
Malik Tanning Industries and Kavish Impex exported polyester printed and dyed fabrics, which were classified as “Technical Textiles β Woven Fabrics of Synthetic Filament Yarn” under ITC (HS) Code 5407. These products were eligible for FPS benefits at the time of export, and the exporters had already received and utilized the incentives.
The Controversial Circular
On 21 October 2011, DGFT issued Policy Circular No. 42, which retrospectively limited FPS benefits for “Technical Textiles” to only 33 items, effective from 1 April 2011. This excluded many products, including those exported by the petitioners, from the incentive scheme. The authorities subsequently demanded the return of Duty Credit Scrips or refund of the duty amounts with interest from the exporters.
Legal Issues Examined
The core legal questions addressed by the Court were:
- Can DGFT issue a circular that retrospectively withdraws export incentives already granted under the Foreign Trade Policy?
- Does DGFT have the authority to amend the list of eligible products for incentives with retrospective effect?
Court’s Analysis and Findings
1. Nature of DGFT’s Powers
- The Foreign Trade Policy is framed by the Central Government under Section 5 of the Foreign Trade (Development and Regulation) Act, 1992.
- DGFT’s role is limited to implementing the policy and clarifying procedural or interpretational doubts, not making substantive policy changes.
- Section 6(3) of the Act specifically excludes the delegation of policy-making powers under Section 5 to DGFT.
2. Retrospective Policy Changes
- The Court held that neither the Central Government nor DGFT can make or amend policy with retrospective effect unless expressly empowered by the statute.
- The Supreme Court’s precedents were cited, emphasizing that vested or accrued rights cannot be taken away by retrospective policy changes unless clearly authorized by law.
3. Interpretation of “Technical Textiles”
- The Court found the classification of “Technical Textiles β Woven Fabrics of Synthetic Filament Yarn” under ITC (HS) Code 5407 to be clear and unambiguous.
- The impugned circular did not clarify an ambiguity but instead substantively restricted the scope of eligible products, which is beyond DGFT’s powers.
4. Vested Rights and Constitutional Protection
- The benefits already availed by the exporters constituted vested rights, protected under Article 300A of the Constitution (right to property).
- The attempt to recover incentives already granted was found to be unlawful.
Judgment and Impact
The Delhi High Court set aside the DGFT’s circular and the subsequent demand letters, ruling that:
- DGFT cannot retrospectively withdraw export incentives already granted under the Foreign Trade Policy.
- Any substantive change to the list of eligible products must be prospective and made by the Central Government, not DGFT.
- Exporters who had already received FPS benefits for eligible products at the time of export cannot be asked to return them due to later policy changes.
Conclusion
This judgment reinforces the principle that government authorities cannot retrospectively alter or withdraw benefits granted under statutory policies unless explicitly authorized by law. It provides much-needed certainty and protection for exporters relying on government incentive schemes, ensuring that vested rights are not arbitrarily taken away.
Connected Matter
Source: Delhi High Court
Handy Download:
Write to us at office@aadrikaalaw.com
Tel: +91-11-4999 2707 I +91-9999005379
