ALO Law Office- IDT Tax I Arbitration I Litigation
Date: 19.03.2026
Gujarat High Court Quashes DRI Show Cause Notices in Customs Tariff Dispute
This Article has been written by Advocate Ravi Shekhar Jha-BALLB & LLM (Constitutional Law) based in New Delhi. The views expressed are based on his interpretation of the law. He can be reached at his email id intelconsul@gmail.com or on his Mobile +91-9999005379.
The High Court of Gujarat, in a landmark judgment delivered on February 3, 2026, has quashed a series of show cause notices issued by the Directorate of Revenue Intelligence (DRI) in a case involving alleged mis-declaration of export goods under the Customs Tariff Act, 1975. The judgment, delivered by Honourable Justices, marks a significant development in the interpretation of customs law and the powers of the DRI. β
Background of the Case
The case involved M/S. S.J.S. International & Anr., a company engaged in the export of nuts, bolts, washers, hand tools, and allied products. β The goods were classified under Chapter Headings 7318, 8205, and 3926 of the Customs Tariff Act, 1975, and exported to Gulf and Upper Gulf regions. β On January 8, 2015, Respondent No. β 2 detained certain export consignments belonging to the petitioner, citing discrepancies in the declared weight and alleged misclassification of goods under Tariff Heading 7318 instead of 7308. β
A seizure memo was issued on January 20, 2015, and provisional release of the goods was granted after the petitioners complied with revised conditions set by the Customs, Excise, and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal (CESTAT). β However, the duty drawback for the consignments was withheld, prompting the petitioners to approach the High Court. β The Court ruled in favor of the petitioners on August 13, 2015, leading to the release of the duty drawback amount. β
Subsequently, on January 12, 2016, the DRI issued a show cause notice proposing confiscation of goods and recovery of differential duty drawback, alleging mis-declaration of weight, classification, and value of the export goods. β The petitioners challenged the notice, citing the lack of authority of the DRI to issue such notices, relying on the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. β Canon India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs (Civil Appeal No. β 1827 of 2018). β
Key Issues in the Case β
The primary issues in the case revolved around:
- Mis-declaration of Goods: Whether the exported goods were correctly classified under Chapter Headings 7318, 8205, and 3926, or if they should have been classified under Heading 7308. β
- Authority of DRI: Whether the DRI had the legal authority to issue the show cause notice, as per the Supreme Court’s ruling in M/s. β Canon India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs. β
Court Proceedings and Judgment β
During the hearing, counsel for the petitioners argued that the show cause notices were issued in 2016, and no stay had been granted on further proceedings. β He cited previous judgments, including Siddhi Vinayak Syntex Pvt. β Ltd. v. Union of India [2017 (352) ELT 455 (Guj.) β], to support the contention that the notices should be quashed. β
Senior Standing Counsel for the Respondent, informed the Court that the Customs Department had accepted the legal position established in an identical matter, Union of India and Anr. β v. M/s. β JBS Exports and Anr. β, decided by the Supreme Court on September 22, 2025 (Special Leave Petition (Civil) Diary No. β(s). 44987/2025). β He submitted that the present petitions could be allowed in light of the Apex Court’s decision. β
Taking into account the submissions and the legal precedents, the High Court ruled in favor of the petitioners and quashed the show cause notices issued by the DRI. β The Court also noted that the department had accepted the legal position in similar cases, further strengthening the petitioners’ case. β
Implications of the Judgment
This judgment has significant implications for exporters and the interpretation of customs law in India. β Key takeaways include:
- Clarification on DRI’s Authority: The judgment reinforces the Supreme Court’s decision in M/s. β Canon India Private Limited v. Commissioner of Customs, which questioned the DRI’s authority to issue show cause notices under the Customs Act. β
- Relief for Exporters: The decision provides relief to exporters who face allegations of mis-declaration and misclassification, ensuring that their rights are protected under the law. β
- Precedent for Future Cases: The acceptance of the legal position by the Customs Department in similar cases, as highlighted by the respondents, sets a precedent for future disputes involving the DRI’s authority. β
Conclusion
The High Court’s decision to quash the show cause notices is a significant victory for M/S. S.J.S. International & Anr. β and other exporters facing similar issues. It underscores the importance of adhering to legal precedents and ensures that government agencies operate within the bounds of their authority. This judgment is expected to have a far-reaching impact on customs-related disputes and the role of the DRI in adjudicating such matters.
Listen to this on our #YouTube Channel
Source: Gujarat High Court
Handy Download:
Write to us at office@aadrikaalaw.com
Tel: +91-11-4999 2707 I +91-9999005379
Leave a Reply